Unlawful delays in Home Office decision making process
As a result of the Court of Appeal based on the case SAID (2018) EWCA Civ 627 where the respondent died few months after waiting 10 years to be granted indefinite leave to remain, immigration judges now can define where delay in consideration of the application crossed the threshold of “mere” and became “manifestly excessive”. This breach itself entitles for the damages from the Home Office. Home Office cannot use internal complaint procedure as a shield. It is not directly applicable to asylum claims.
Posted on 04.04.2018.
We provide services
Other useful articles
- To settle in this country forever is not a right, but a privilege. And it must be earned
- Biggest overhaul of legal migration model in 50 years announced
- Home Secretary announces major asylum and other changes in new policy paper: “Restoring Order and Control”
- New suitability rules will apply to Appendix FM and other human rights applications
- Date set for commencement of new student, graduate and work immigration rules
- Draconian HMRC ‘Interaction Register’ Set to Drive Tax Advisers Out of Market, Warns ICAEW
Get specialist advice
Please contact with one of our immigration lawyers by phone +44 (0) 207 907 1460 (London), +971 509 265 140, +971 525 977 456 (Dubai) or complete our enquiry
Contact us








