Company
UK Companies
Investments
Immigration
TIER 1 General (HSMP)
TIER 1 Investor
TIER 1 Entrepreneur
TIER 1 Post Study work
Sponsorship Certificate
TIER 2 General (Work Permit)
TIER 2 Minister of Religion
TIER 2 Sportsperson
TIER 2 Intra-Company Transfer
Students
TIER 5 Youth Mobility
Tier 5 Temporary Workers
creative and sporting
Tier 5 Temporary Workers
charity workers
Tier 5 Temporary Workers
religious workers
Tier 5 Temporary Workers
government authorised exchange
Tier 5 Temporary Workers
international agreement
Visitor Visas – General
Business Visitor
Sports Visitor
Entertainer Visitor
Special Visitors
Visitors under the UK/
(ADS) Agreement
Children
EEA national
Spouse Visa
Unmarried Partners
Right of Private & Family life
Domestic Violence
Switching Rules
Appeals
Incountry Appeals
Out country Appeals
Permanent Residence
Naturalization
FAQ
Our Services and Prices
Credit Card Payment
Contacts

IMMIGRATION


NB: This is the out-of-date version of the website. This page is not being updated.
To see the new version, please follow the link:www.lawfirmuk.net/Immigration




Immigration Appeals

Immigration Appeals can be divided into two main categories:

Similarly the immigration decisions can also be categorized as those attracting full rights of appeal and those giving limited rights of appeal. In case of full rights of appeal, the appellant can make use of all the grounds of appeal as provided by the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. While where a person has limited rights of appeal, that means that they may appeal to an adjudicator on certain specified grounds.

The grounds are:

  • Human rights - the decision is (or removal as a result would be) unlawful under the Human Rights Act, in that it is incompatible with the person's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
  • Asylum - removal as a result of the decision would breach the UK's obligations under the Refugee Convention [this appeal ground is not available from abroad]
  • Race discrimination - a public authority has unlawfully discriminated against the appellant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ask a question
Map
Subscribe
SEARCH
Copyright © 2000-2009
Law Firm Limited

FIANet
Law Firm Limited english version russian version Send by email Ask a question Print version main page search map send by email